A random June 2009 bar on Apple, weekly chart. Marked up by hand first: the trend from the last two ranges, a decision declined three times, waiting for discount, the monthly imbalance and the reaction from it, a weekly most traded volume zone as the confirmation, three questions, points A and B. Only then is Trade Model switched on — and it sees the range WIDER than the hand markup without changing the conclusion.
We take a random bar in history, define the narrative, and read the market live — no scripts, just structure and facts.
1. The trend from the last two ranges
2. It is already late here
3. Three refusals and waiting for discount
4. The range is wider than it looked
5. The order flow zone and the monthly imbalance
6. The reaction and the most traded volume zone
7. The three questions of the plan
8. Checking the work with the indicator
9. The replay and the outcome
The trend is read off the last two trading ranges, not off the slope of a line and not by eye.
A decision is declined three times in a row: price is pushed to a third of the range, then again, and both times that is not enough. Patience here is part of the method, not a pause in the video.
The boundary of a range is counted from where liquidity was taken — that is what makes it a boundary rather than just the low of a candle.
Liquidity taken means nothing by itself: what gives it meaning is the reaction. While there is no reaction, the descent continues.
Point A is the monthly imbalance price bounced from; point B is the established high of the weekly range.
The indicator is switched on AFTER the manual markup and sees the range wider. The conclusion does not change — the level of detail does. The order matters more than the result: otherwise it would prompt the answer instead of checking it.
This material is open: no application, nothing to pay. There is one paid product — the Trade Model indicator, and it is not on sale right now: we are taking signups for the queue.
JOIN THE QUEUE