Zone or no zone — one candle decides

1. The trend from the last two ranges

2. Two ranges and a pullback from a third

3. Two liquidities, treated differently

4. The condition named aloud — and failed

5. The zone appears one candle later

6. Points A and B

7. The three answers of the plan

8. Checking the work with the indicator

9. The hypothesis, the invalidation and the outcome

The random bar landed on twenty twenty-four — an earlier one was taken, two thousand eight, so that no already familiar picture stood in the way. That is part of the procedure.

The trend is read off the last two trading ranges. In the first one the reaction came not from the middle but from roughly a third of the depth — that is normal: the depth of a pullback is not obliged to repeat.

Two liquidities deserve different treatment: price has reached the nearer one, and that is where a reaction is awaited; it is too early to talk about the farther one, price has not come to it.

The condition for a confirmation is named IN ADVANCE and aloud: hold above the level and a most traded volume zone forms. On the first candle it does not hold, and that is said plainly: there is no zone.

The zone appears one candle later, and only then is the plan built. Point A is the low at that zone, point B is the established high.

The indicator is switched on AFTER the manual markup: it confirmed both ranges and added that the order flow overlaps with the monthly imbalance. The order matters more than the result.